Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2016 11:35:41 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#811455: RFS: qhttpengine/0.1.0+dfsg1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #811455,
regarding RFS: qhttpengine/0.1.0+dfsg1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
811455: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811455
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qhttpengine"

 * Package name    : qhttpengine
   Version         : 0.1.0+dfsg1-1
   Upstream Author :Nathan Osman <[email protected]>
 * URL             :https://github.com/nitroshare/qhttpengine
 * License         : MIT
   Section         : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  libqhttpengine-dbg - HTTP server for Qt applications - debug info
  libqhttpengine-dev - HTTP server for Qt applications - development files
  libqhttpengine-doc - HTTP server for Qt applications - documentation
  libqhttpengine-examples - HTTP server for Qt applications - examples
  libqhttpengine0 - HTTP server for Qt applications

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/qhttpengine


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qhttpengine/qhttpengine_0.1.0+dfsg1-1.dsc

More information about qhttpengine can be obtained 
fromhttps://github.com/nitroshare/qhttpengine.

  Regards,
   Nathan Osman

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi



>First of all, I apologize for the mix-up. I wasn't paying very close 
>attention to who was sending the emails. I think I've got it all 
>straightened out now :)


not a problem at all :)
>As described below, I've made the changes you requested and made the 
>adjustment for observing TMPDIR as Mattia suggested. Please let me know 
>if you have any further questions or if there are any other changes I 
>need to make.


I'm going to upload right now, as soon as the connection allows me to do it

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to