Hi,
>Why do you think it would be useless? the "bug" is introduce with a stable-release-update, and should be fixed with another s-p-u fixing it with a backport means the user should be aware of the fix in another pocket, enable it, install it, and so on. I guess having both "issue" and "fix" on the same pocket is reasonable (note: I have no authoritative hat on) > Because it's a trivial backport? >It's easier to install a trivial backport on a stable system than to >enable the testing repo and carefully set up pinning etc. sure, having a fix in stable is something we should do! Gianfranco