Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:29:53 +0000 (UTC) with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#828104: RFS: sollya/5.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- library for safe floating-point code development has caused the Debian Bug report #828104, regarding RFS: sollya/5.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- library for safe floating-point code development to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 828104: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828104 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Sponsors, I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package sollya [1], an advanced numnerical tool which comes with an interactive interface and a library. It targets floatting-point code development. This package was packaged on behalf of the Debian Science Team. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sollya.git -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, done! >Indeed. I was surprised as well. It appears that the provided library >is a wrapping library but not a core library. ok >This is a mistake of mine: the *-dev was meant to the libsollya-dev package: >I have just corrected it. ok >I have just attempted to break the circles of suggestions by introducing >Enhances fields. I still don't get why "Conflicts: libsollya" and also the Pre-Depends can be dropped post wheezy >> 4) debian GPL-3, * is CeCILL-C >> >> this makes difficult to forward patches upstream > >What do you suggest ? use the same upstream license. >Sorry I do not get your point here. >My first reaction was: they are free to do so. yes, indeed, but why mention a license that is not used in the package? >I think it is ok: where could there exist an issue ? nowhere :) I just don't like too much the foreign multiarch tag, so I have to check carefully for it cheers, Gianfranco
--- End Message ---
