Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:44:26 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #825532,
regarding RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
825532: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825532
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: sponsorship-requests
severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shadowsocks-libev"
* Package name : shadowsocks-libev
Version : 2.4.6+20160526+ds-1
Upstream Author : Max Lv <[email protected]>
* URL : http://www.shadowsocks.org
* License : GPL-3+
Section : net
It builds those binary packages:
libshadowsocks-dev - lightweight and secure socks5 proxy (development files)
libshadowsocks1 - lightweight and secure socks5 proxy (shared library)
shadowsocks-libev - lightweight and secure socks5 proxy
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/shadowsocks-libev
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shadowsocks-libev/shadowsocks-libev_2.4.6+20160526+ds-1.dsc
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 17B3ACB1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
>So I re-package the latest upstream, with the changes below:
>- update version
>- add license info under man/ folder
>- add lintian-overrides (2 false positive)
I would prefer to fix the manpage license (I guess it is just a matter
of case-sensitiveness) and don't care about the watch lintian override.
But if you want to keep them, you are free to do so, just remember to remove
them once the two Debian bugs are fixed.
Sponsored,
G.
--- End Message ---
