Your message dated Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:36:39 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS:
libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor
has caused the Debian Bug report #829692,
regarding RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
829692: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829692
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU to the package libu2f-host.
* Package name : libu2f-host
Version : 1.1.2-0.1
Upstream Author : Yubico AG
* URL : https://developers.yubico.com/libu2f-host/
* License : GPL-3+
Section : utils
The upload fixes issues with the copyright file and symbol versionning,
and includes the latest upstream version (1.1.2).
It builds those binary packages:
libu2f-host-dev - Development files for the U2F host C library libu2f-host
libu2f-host0 - Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) host communication C Library
u2f-host - Command line tool to do Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) operations
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libu2f-host
The proper maintainer of the package seems unresponsive, and 2 RC bugs
(FTBFS) were previously fixed by codehelp and myself after sitting
without acknowledgment for a month.
Thanks a lot to codehelp for teaching me how to handle symbol
files properly.
Best,
nicoo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
>Appears to be good, uploaded.
>Thanks for your work!
thanks for sponsoring, I looked at the package, but I didn't have time to look
properly
at it and reply here :)
I admit I'm a little bit lost on this change
(my fault! to be clear, this is why I'm redirecting to -mentors mail list)
all the symbols have been updated:
e.g.
[snip]
- u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 0.0
+ u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 1.0
[snip]
what does this mean? do reverse-dependencies needs a rebuild then?
reverse-depends -b libu2f-host-dev
Reverse-Build-Depends
=====================
* pam-u2f
I admit, I don't have a strong knowledge, so I ask:
adding symbols should be fine because there aren't ABI changes that breaks
reverse-dependencies,
but changing the version on a current symbol does mean that the symbol changed
and then
they need a rebuild?
thanks for sponsoring, I hope I'll lean something new from this RFS
thanks :)
G.
--- End Message ---
