Hi, on the old package tracker https://packages.qa.debian.org/libb/libburn.html i see a problem report libburn-doc: Override says doc - optional, .deb says doc - extra libburn-dev: Override says libdevel - optional, .deb says libdevel - extra
Google brought me to https://wiki.debian.org/FtpMaster/Override and http://ftp.debian.org/debian/indices/override.sid.main.gz where i find these lines libburn-doc optional doc libburn-dev optional libdevel The announcement https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/01/msg00307.html invites me to file a bug if i don't like the override. Well, i don't have a strong opinion myself but rather wonder how it was decided to put the lines into override.sid.main.gz . Are there reverse dependencies which require priority "optional" ? Shall i change the priorities in debian/control ? (Is it a bug or a feature that the new package tracker does not warn ? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libburn ) Have a nice day :) Thomas
