Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2016 20:32:02 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#827425: RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written
with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind
has caused the Debian Bug report #827425,
regarding RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation
and minimal privileges in mind
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
827425: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme"
* Package name : lacme
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Author : Guilhem Moulin <[email protected]>
* URL : https://git.guilhem.org/lacme/about/
* License : GPL-3+
Section : utils
It builds the following binary packages:
lacme — ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in
mind
lacme-accountd — lacme account key manager
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/lacme
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lacme/lacme_0.1-1.dsc
More information about lacme can be obtained from
https://git.guilhem.org/lacme/about/ .
Changes since the last upload:
lacme (0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release. (Closes: #827357, #827358.)
Thanks!
Cheers,
--
Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
> I'm still looking for a sponsor for this package. Would anyone be
> willing to sponsor (or at least review) it?
on deferred/10, to give enough time other people to complain about the team
maintaining or something I missed
thanks,
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
