Hi Gianfranco! On 2 August 2016 at 15:59, Gianfranco Costamagna <[email protected]> wrote: > >>I am looking for a sponsor for this updated backport of btrfs-progs. > > > I see some other changes other than the no-change bpo > > -Depends: btrfs-progs, ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends} > +Depends: btrfs-progs (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, > ${shlibs:Depends} > > > -Depends: btrfs-progs-dbg, ${misc:Depends}+Depends: btrfs-progs-dbg (= > ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends} > > > can you please refresh my poor memory about the backport issue and mention it > in changelog > (if you consider the change worth an inclusion on backport pocket)
Oh man, I'd completely forgotten I'd made those modifications to my tree! I never got a definitive answer to the discussion on the following debian-backports thread. Could you please take a look at it and let me know if I should a) keep these modifications b) drop them c) change them d) additionally submit a patch against btrfs-progs in sid. It did seem like the issue was primarily user error, but good programming does its best to elegantly handle user errors, you know? Sender: [email protected] ... Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:32:32 +0100 ... Message-ID: <canbhlujajoyo-isqylnrn+cbmqndmfxpc+whvzgsoqwc+az...@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problem with btrfs-progs package From: Dimitri John Ledkov <[email protected]> To: Uher Marek <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas D Steeves <[email protected]>, [email protected] Thank you :-) Nicholas
