Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2016 06:20:41 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#835551: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.x-1~bpo8+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #835551,
regarding RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.1-1~bpo8+1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
835551: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835551
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated backport of "btrfs-progs"
Package name : btrfs-progs
Version : 4.7-1~bpo8+1
It builds these binary packages:
btrfs-progs - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities
btrfs-progs-dbg - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (debug)
btrfs-progs-udeb - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (udeb)
(udeb)
btrfs-tools - transitional dummy package
btrfs-tools-dbg - transitional dummy package
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfs-progs
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.7-1~bpo8+1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
btrfs-progs (4.7-1~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
-- Nicholas D Steeves <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:19:01 -0400
btrfs-progs (4.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
-- Dimitri John Ledkov <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:52:07 +0100
btrfs-progs (4.6.1-1~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
-- Nicholas D Steeves <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:58:05 -0400
Regards,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
(no need to reopen, because it means "somebody sponsor this RFS" :) )
>Please remove this backport from the deferred queue asap! Chris
>Murphy found "I'm getting some weird unexplained errors that only progs 4.7
>complains about (clean scrubs, clean mounts, completely working file
>system, but a buncha backref complaints from 4.7's btrfs check)" <
>http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg58325.html >.
>
>Furthermore, from what I gather from that email (and a fuzzy analysis
>of other recent posts to linux-btrfs), btrfs-progs-4.5.3 and 4.6.1
>(and of course 4.4.1) are the "known good" userspace for users who
>have chosen to run linux-4.4.x LTS. In light of this, I definitely
>don't think that 4.7.x is appropriate for backports.
>
>I believe the current bpo version 4.6.1 is our best option for
>supporting users using linux-4.4.x-to-4.6.x, and I've noticed that
>there's quite a spread in linux-image bpo bug reports.
deleted.
but I guess linux 4.7 will eventually go in backports.
G.
--- End Message ---
