Your message dated Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:03:53 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#837040: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.1-1~bpo8+1 [RC NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #837040,
regarding RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.2-0.1 [RC NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
837040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837040
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: grave
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an urgent NMU of "btrfs-progs". Upstream has
marked this as an "urgent fix" <
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog#btrfs-progs-4.7.2_.28Sep_2016.29
>
Sept 5th I filed bug #836778 notifying the maintainer of the issue.
Package name : btrfs-progs
Version : 4.7.1-1~bpo8+1
Section : admin
It builds these binary packages:
btrfs-progs - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities
btrfs-progs-dbg - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (debug)
btrfs-progs-udeb - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (udeb) (udeb)
btrfs-tools - transitional dummy package
btrfs-tools-dbg - transitional dummy package
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfs-progs
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.7.1-1~bpo8+1.dsc
It is also available here:
https://github.com/sten0/btrfs-progs.git
Changes since the last upload:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release. (Closes #836778)
Regards,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 pending
control: severity 836778 serious
Justification: I think data losses are considered serious RC bug in Debian
Hi,
>Il Giovedì 8 Settembre 2016 7:21, Nicholas D Steeves <[email protected]> ha
>scritto:
>On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:11:31AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:57:32AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> > Package: sponsorship-requests
>> > Severity: grave
>> >
>> > I am looking for a sponsor for an urgent NMU of "btrfs-progs". Upstream
>> > has marked this as an "urgent fix" <
>> > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog#btrfs-progs-4.7.2_.28Sep_2016.29
>>
>> > Package name : btrfs-progs
>> > Version : 4.7.1-1~bpo8+1
>>
>> Except, you see, it's 4.7 and 4.7.1 which are the buggy versions, 4.6.1 is
>> unaffected. So you demand, with a grave severity, to overwrite a known-good
>> version with one with a data loss bug.
>
>> --
>> Second "wet cat laying down on a powered on box-less SoC on the desk" close
>> shave in a week. Protect your ARMs, folks!
>
>I hit "r" instead of "g", so my last reply didn't make it to the bug-tracker.
>This is an error in my bug submission, and I am embarassed I made that mistake
>(too >late here, I'm going to sleep). It should read:
>
>Package name : btrfs-progs
>Version : 4.7.2-0.1
>
>5 Sept (I think, it might have been earlier) I asked Gianfranco to cancel my
>bpo in the deferred queue because of this issue.
I sponsored in deferred/7, after adding a ":" in changelog, to quiet
"E possible-missing-colon-in-closes
Closes #836778"
Dmitry, would be nice to speed it up :)
cheers,
G.
--- End Message ---
