control: close -1
ciao Pino, >"my"? Since when? I don't see your name neither in Maintainer nor >Uploaders, and there are no other forms of cooperation with us about >this. please don't pay much attention to this, it is something "autogenerated" by debexpo and mentors website :) >... and noone of the packagers got any request for this. >Mateusz, RFS is *not* supposed to be a maintainer hijack -- the usual >way of *cooperating* with existing maintainers still works. NMU isn't a package hijack, but you are right :) >Next weekend, yes. And even if I cannot personally, there are other >people of the debian-qt-kde team who can help with this. >(Which means: Gianfranco, please do not NMU this at all.) I owned the bug and tagged it moreinfo just for this reason: I don't want to NMU it, and I want to avoid other people doing that. Now, that you have answered, we can close this request. Mateusz, please read the NMU policy [1] [2], about putting debdiff in the bug you are closing, keeping changes minimal, giving the maintainer enough time to answer and so on [1] https://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerUpload [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu thanks Pino for taking care of it, I hope it will save some of your time, I know Mateusz has good skills and good intentions, just maybe he didn't pay much attention to the policy :) thanks again, Gianfranco
