Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2016 04:29:54 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line closing RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #844184, regarding RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA] to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 844184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for review and a sponsor for my package "src:muse-el". I've CC'd Sean Whitton who is willing to help me with elpa, LISP, and any emacs-on-Debian integration issues. Here are a few things I'm wondering about: Are the generated packages in the correct sections for an elpafied package? Is removing hrefs to favicon.ico (Bug: #775885) sufficient? Distributing a favicon.ico seems unnecessary and honestly, I'm against it. In Canada, because the author retains all distribution rights in the absence of a license or declared copyright, even something as trivial as a favicon.ico can be unredistributable. I couldn't find the license on Michael Olson's website <mwolson.org>, so I decided it was best not to copy it. Do my patches look ok? Should elpafied packages continue to be arch-independent? Is debian/changelog too verbose and could it be condensed? Package name : muse-el Version : 3.20+dfsg-1 Section : editors It builds those binary packages: elpa-muse - Author and publish projects using Wiki-like markup muse-el - transitional dummy package for elpa-muse. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/muse-el Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/muse-el/muse-el_3.20+dfsg-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: muse-el (3.20+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New Maintainer. * debian/control: - Bump required debhelper to >=9. - Update emacs dependency. - Add emacs-goodies-el dependency, which provides htmlize.el. * Switch to debcompat 9; Switch to 3.0 (quilt) non-native packaging. * Add patch to fix privacy breaches; removes hrefs. (Closes: #775885) * Elpafy! (depends on dh-elpa). * Add patch to disable non-DFSG compliant texi stuff. * Install docs and examples the new dh_way. * debian/rules: - add override to build examples and autoloads. - add override to install upstream changelog series. * debian/copyright: - Fix misattributed source (found by comparing timestamps in comments between gna.org tarballs and git sources). - Update format. - Add debian/* section. * Include images used by the QuickStart.muse example. (Closes: #720121) * Add patch to use Debian's "see" command instead of "open". Thank you Kevin Ryde, I didn't know about the existence of "see" before reading this bug report. (Closes: #720126) * Patch README to explain how installed files relate to src:muse-el. -- Nicholas D Steeves <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:58:45 -0400 Regards, Nicholas D Steeves
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Package muse-el has been removed from mentors.
--- End Message ---
