Your message dated Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:10:21 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#846306: RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #846306,
regarding RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
846306: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846306
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 846237 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ondir"
* Package name : ondir
Version : 0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1
Upstream Author : Alec Thomas <[email protected]>
* URL : http://swapoff.org/ondir.html
* License : GPL-2
Section : utils
It builds those binary packages:
ondir - Automate tasks specific to certain directories in the shell
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ondir
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ondir/ondir_0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1.dsc
The package is also available via git in the debian/master branch of:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/ondir.git
Regards,
Christian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Christian, Alec
>
>Done.
>> CFLAGS_FOR_MAKEFILE=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS) $(shell
>> dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS) -DVERSION=\"$(VERSION)\"
>> -DGLOBAL_CONF=\"/etc/onddirrc\"
>>
>> I prefer CFLAGS and then CPPFLAGS
you didn't change the order, but nevermind :)
>after thinking about what Peter said in this thread, I removed
peter said *exactly* my opinion. Overriding flags in Makefile should be done
only when necessary and "cum grano salis"
(I probably never found an Use case for overriding the default flags)
but you agreeded this is a bug, and hacky rules vs patch is an equivalent
approach,
so lets sponsor and open a bug
>I've done so, received a quick response that v2 or later is ok,
>and added a comment to d/copyright.
nice, maybe try to get it on github, because I don't think ftpmasters will
accept
a "private corrispondence" email with no public record.
Alec, would you please answer here too?
thanks
G.
--- End Message ---
