Hi, >when libraries were build with gcc 5 'v5' was added to the soversion >inside the library name. Should this extension be kept even if there is >a new soversion. For instance for the package libbpp-core2v5 which has >now soversion=3. Should the new package be named > > libbpp-core3v5 >or > libbpp-core3
the latter. and if you backport libbpp-core-3v5 to jessie-backport (so, with an old-ABI libstdc++ or whatever), don't forget to rename it back to libpp-core-3) G.
