Even if these code lines would work they probably should be reformulated by upstream so they are easier to read:
++i assigns I the value I+1 and returns the new i. And then i is assigned another new value by the i= in the same line... ...a better way to express what I believe the line should mean would be: ++i; i &= 3; Perhaps the c compiler is as unsure which assignment should have the precedence as I am. Kind regards, Gunter. -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
