Yes, drop z.lib in favor or zimg. Besides, users would typically discover the library via pkg-config with the `zimg` keyword or use it with the link flag -lzimg. Based on that, it sounds to me that the canonical name for the library should be (lib)zimg, not z.lib.
Naming is hard. Ghis On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 14:39 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: > yes, it can be confusing since the package name is just 'z' library > and '.' emphasis the space z and lib. > should i revert it back it zimg? > this package closes https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864888 > looks like i forget to mention in request template,but added it in > debian/changelog > > On 18 June 2017 at 14:27, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 00:54 +0530, Sanjeev wrote: > > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zimg" > > > > > > * Package name : zimg > > > Version : 2.5.1-1 > > > Upstream Author : sekrit-twc > > > * URL : https://github.com/sekrit-twc/zimg > > > * License : WTFPL > > > Section : libs > > > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > > > libzimg-dev - devel file for z.lib library > > > libzimg-examples - examples using z.lib library > > > libzimg2 - z.lib shared library > > > > Am I the only one concerned about the confusion between the standard > > zlib library and this z.lib? > > > > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > > following URL: > > > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/zimg > > > > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > > > command: > > > > > > dget -x > > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zimg/zimg_2.5.1-1.dsc > > > > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > > > > add file to copyright > > > > This looks wrong. What is the ITP bug you are supposed to close with > > this initial upload? It should be referenced in the change log. > > > > Ghis
