On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 07:15:24PM -0300, Vitor Augusto wrote: > I understood, by your questioning about RC, that I should remove it. If > so, I agree! I am new at packaging. I put RC there as I thought I should > have chosen between ITA,ITP,QA,NMU,RC. It is not clear in the rfs-howto > that this field is optional. Then, RC removed from subject.
"RC" means a "Release Critical" bug, ie, severity:critical, serious or grave; these tend to block a package from being considered releasable and point to a bug that wants a stable update. (Stable updates are nowadays also accepted for severity:important on a case-by-case basis.) > Lintian error "bad syntax of NEWS.Debian" is corrected at the package on > mentors now. Just needed two spaces in the beginning of the lines, > instead of one it had. > > Lintian error about "debian/control" corrected based on your suggestion. > > Name of "Karl E. Jorgensen" corrected! Well, <F8> means ø so it should be "Jørgensen" but 7-bit ASCII only might be good enough. > Now everything seems alright. Looks good to me, uploaded. It would be nice if you could file RFSes as bugs rather than merely a mail to the list -- this way they don't fall through the cracks if no one acts upon them immediately. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ A dumb species has no way to open a tuna can. ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ A smart species invents a can opener. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ A master species delegates.
