Thanks for yours comments! I will take it in the future. Best regards!
El vie., 25 de may. de 2018 a la(s) 12:00, Adam Borowski < [email protected]> escribió: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:10:41AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > > On 2018-05-25 at 09:47, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:48:23PM -0300, eamanu15 wrote: > > >> Package: sponsorship-requests > > >> Severity: normal > > > > > > This should be mailed to [email protected], not the mailing list. It > > > did not get a tracking bug this way, thus those who use the BTS as > > > their primary view wouldn't notice it. > > > > Actually, the original mail as I received it *did* have [email protected] in the > > To: list; it just also had the mailing list's address present explicitly. > > > > How the software which normally results in a RFS bug getting passed on > > to this mailing list handles that situation I'm not sure. > > Indeed: > } To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > } "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Arnaud > Fontaine > } <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > } <[email protected]>, Debian Mentors > List > } <[email protected]> > > And a bug _was_ created (#900041), just somehow not forwarded to this list. > Probably because the list was already in the "To:" field. > > Closing it then, thanks for noticing. > > > Meow! > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ .globl _start↵.data↵rc: .ascii "/etc/init.d/rcS\0"↵.text↵_start > ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ mov $57,%rax↵syscall↵cmp $0,%rax↵jne child↵parent:↵mov $61,%rax > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ mov $-1,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall↵jmp parent↵child: > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ mov $59,%rax↵mov $rc,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall > > -- Arias Emmanuel https://www.linkedin.com/in/emmanuel-arias-437a6a8a http://eamanu.com
