> On Jun 23, 2018, at 8:31 PM, Paul Wise <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Lev Lazinskiy wrote: > >> I am happy to reach out to upstream for clarification, but I am basing my >> current information on this comment [1] from the RFP[2]. >> >> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835086#35 >> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835086 > > I see, I hadn't read that thread. It might be worth posting in the > upstream forums anyway, both to alert upstream and to get potential > collaborators for your project.
Thank you for the pointer. Yes I think this is a good idea. I'll get started on that route. In the meantime, could you (or someone) add a nextcloud-client repo under the Debian organization in Salsa and make me (levlaz-guest) the admin/owner? I think packaging up the client is not as controversial and I was going to get started there anyway. The desktop client can be used independently of the where the server is installed and I think it would provide a lot of value to nextcloud users on Debian. Best, Lev
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
