Your message dated Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:49:40 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#909117: RFS: libmd5-rfc/0.0+20020413-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #909117,
regarding RFS: libmd5-rfc/0.0+20020413-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
909117: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libmd5-rfc"

 * Package name    : libmd5-rfc
   Version         : 0.0+20020413
   Upstream Author : Aladdin Enterprises
 * URL             : https://sourceforge.net/projects/libmd5-rfc/
 * License         : zlib
   Section         : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  libmd5-rfc-dev - RFC1321-based (RSA-free) MD5 library - development headers
 libmd5-rfc0 - RFC1321-based (RSA-free) MD5 library

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/libmd5-rfc


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libj/libmd5-rfc/libmd5-rfc_0.0+20020413-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release (Closes: #909116)


Regards,
 Yangfl

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:31:40AM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> Adam Borowski <[email protected]> 于2018年9月19日周三 上午3:22写道:
> >
> > But, with md5 thoroughly broken, do you have any reason to include this
> > library?  It's unfit for cryptographic purposes, and there exist much faster
> > hashes for non-crypto uses.
> 
> Actually 
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=typedef+unsigned+int+md5_word_t

Ah, so many uses in the archive.  Thanks for pointing this out.

> But, if you think bundling is fine, I won't insist on pushing this package.

Packaged libraries are greatly superior to bundling.

In NEW.


喵!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ What Would Jesus Do, MUD/MMORPG edition:
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ • multiplay with an admin char to benefit your mortal [Mt3:16-17]
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ • abuse item cloning bugs [Mt14:17-20, Mt15:34-37]
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ • use glitches to walk on water [Mt14:25-26]

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to