On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 03:14:23AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:59:03PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> > El dom., 5 de ene. de 2020 a la(s) 18:40, Adam Borowski
> > (kilob...@angband.pl) escribió:
> > > On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 01:37:20AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> > > >  * Package name    : jcc
> > > >    Version         : 3.6-1
> > >
> > > > It builds those binary packages:
> > > >
> > > >   python-jcc - generator for a Python extension from Java classes 
> > > > (Python 2)
> > > >   python3-jcc - generator for a Python extension from Java classes 
> > > > (Python 3)
> > > >   jcc - generator for a Python extension from Java classes 
> > > > (transitional)
> > >
> > > [Note: a trip through binNEW is required.]

> I see the changelog still claims:
>    * Create python-jcc and python3-jcc packages, and make jcc a transitional
>      one.
> while neither python-jcc nor jcc remain.
> 
> Also, a cosmetic issue: "X-Python3-Version: >= 3.3" makes lintian complain
> about such an ancient relation being useless.  It does no harm, so it's mere
> cleanup.

Hi!
The RFS is still rotting, for nothing but a changelog entry.  Should I just
edit that line and upload as-is?


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀                                       -- <willmore> on #linux-sunxi
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

Reply via email to