On 5/31/20 9:19 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > If you want to follow this route, your next step would be now to contact > the fox1.6 maintainer by filing a wishlist bug against src:fox1.6, asking > to package the version you need, explaining the situation and maybe (== > if you want) tell them that you would commit helping to offset the extra > work caused by maintaining the development snapshot. > > * dak spits out those r-deps: > ace: libfox-1.6-dev > gogglesmm: libfox-1.6-dev > libgwenhywfar: libfox-1.6-dev > pcsc-cyberjack: libfox-1.6-dev > sumo: libfox-1.6-dev > xfe: libfox-1.6-dev (>= 1.6.45) > I tried doing this with reportbug but I failed. It asks me first for the package where the bug is found. I entered as you suggested "src:fox1.6". Reportbug complains "src:fox1.6 is not a valid package name.". What am I doing wrong?
-- Mit freundlichen Grüssen Plüss Roland Game Development and Game Engine Technologies https://dragondreams.ch
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
