On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:58:10AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "spyne" which has a > py2removal RC and a grave bug and was autoremoved from testing. The > package is Python 2 only but the current upstream version has Python 3 > support. I converted it to build a binary python3-spyne package. The > bugs are open long enough for a NMU.
Note that today there was a discussion with the maintainer, on #938554. While I completely agree with Bastian, and think that having a package RC-buggy for 10 months and gone from testing for 7 is grounds for a 0-day NMU, not merely one announced half a year in advance, is no good just because upstream hasn't tagged the new version yet -- let's see what the maintainer will do. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good. ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- <willmore> on #linux-sunxi ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
