On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 04:50:20PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > At https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/gnutls28 > are the packages 'gnutls30' and 'gnutls28-dev'. > > And missing to me are the packages 'gnutls28' and 'gnutls30-dev'
Just historical cruft if you ask me.
> But are they truely missing? In other words:
> Why is there no 'gnutls28'? (There is a 'gnutls28-dev' )
There used to be, simply the SONAME changed over time from 28 to 30
(back in 2015).
> Why is there a 'gnutls30' whitout a 'gnutls30-dev'?
Because renaming -dev packages is hard. If I were the maintainer I
would make the effort to rename it to gnutls-dev without the number (and
there is a Provides in place already, so you could just go with that).
Back in the time versioned -dev packages were considered ok, nowadays
they are discouraged.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
