Could it be a naming collision between the private libmux and an official libmux package?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:13 PM Stephen Dennis <[email protected]> wrote: > How can I reproduce what you are seeing? The package doesn't use libtool, > and no .la files are produced or included. There should be no reference to > libxbase64. I'm not even sure what that is. > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:30 PM Adam Borowski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 04:53:52PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: >> > Package name : xbase64 >> > Version : 3.1.2-14 >> >> > xbase64 (3.1.2-14) unstable; urgency=medium >> > . >> > * Migrate to debhelper-compat 13: >> > - debian/control: Add debhelper-compat (= 13). >> > - Remove debian/compat. >> > - Add usr/bin/xbase64-config into new debian/not-installed. >> > - Add usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libxbase64.la to >> > debian/libxbase64-bin.install. >> > * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.1.0 (No changes needed)
