Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 23:20:47 +0100
with message-id
<CAMw=ZnRVbtRN-3rLnWH=_kqu6zus1ecvxkcsnoytbfatdbu...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: RFS: pacman-package-manager/6.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple
library-based package manager
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006020,
regarding RFS: pacman-package-manager/6.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple library-based
package manager
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1006020: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pacman-package-manager":
* Package name : pacman-package-manager
Version : 6.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Pacman Development Team <[email protected]>
* URL : https://archlinux.org/pacman/
* License : GPL-2+, MIT, curl, unlicense, public-domain
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/benthetechguy/pacman
Section : admin
It builds those binary packages:
pacman-package-manager - Simple library-based package manager
libalpm13 - Arch Linux Package Management library
makepkg - Arch Linux package build utility
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/pacman-package-manager/
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacman-package-manager/pacman-package-manager_6.0.1-1.dsc
Changes for the initial release:
pacman-package-manager (6.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial Package (Closes: #511994)
Regards,
-- Ben Westover
OpenPGP_0xC311C5F54E89B698.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 22:44, Ben Westover <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 7/29/22 5:50 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Still a couple of Lintian warnings to fix, then you can finalize the
> > changelog and I'll upload:
> >
> > I: pacman-package-manager source: duplicate-long-description libalpm-dev
> > libalpm13 [debian/control]
> > I: libalpm-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
>
> Fixed
>
> > I: libalpm13: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
>
> There's not really much more information to say on libalpm; I don't know
> what else to put in the description without making it a word salad.
>
> > I: libalpm13: package-contains-empty-directory [usr/share/libalpm/hooks/]
> > I: makepkg: package-contains-empty-directory [usr/share/makepkg-template/]
>
> Fixed
>
> > This one doesn't need to be fixed in the package, just send a patch
> > upstream and it can be picked up in the next version:
> >
> > I: pacman-package-manager: typo-in-manual-page "allows to" "allows one to"
> > [usr/share/man/man8/pacman.8.gz:264]
>
> Sent the patch upstream.
>
> I didn't even know about these Lintian tags since lintian by default
> only shows warnings and above (these are info tags). I've updated my
> machine's Lintian config to show me everything, even down to pedantic.
> My (minor) changes have been pushed to Salsa and Mentors.
Looks good, uploaded.
--- End Message ---
