Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2022 23:31:01 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: RE: Bug#1015169: RE: Bug#1015169: RFS: mir-eval/0.7-1
[ITP] -- Common metrics for common audio/music processing tasks
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015169,
regarding RFS: mir-eval/0.7-1 [ITP] -- Common metrics for common audio/music
processing tasks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1015169: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015169
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mir-eval":
* Package name : mir-eval
Version : 0.7-1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/craffel/mir_eval/issues
* URL : https://github.com/craffel/mir_eval
* License : Expat/MIT
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mir-eval
Section : python
The source builds the following binary packages:
python3-mir-eval - Common metrics for common audio/music processing tasks
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/mir-eval/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mir-eval/mir-eval_0.7-1.dsc
Changes for the initial release:
mir-eval (0.7-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1015152)
Regards,
Nilson Silva
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Nilson,
Please see my changes on the repo on how to reduce the patch size properly.
This is a one-time thing to demonstrate that there is a lot to achieve when you
apply the patches at the right place.
You should take some time to analyze the reason why the original float
comparison tolerance value is not sufficient.
I have just uploaded mir-eval.
Thanks,
Bastian
--- End Message ---
