Your message dated Sun, 06 Oct 2024 13:25:21 +0800
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1084044: RFS: elpher/3.6.3-1 [Team] -- friendly gopher
and gemini client
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084044,
regarding RFS: elpher/3.6.3-1 [Team] -- friendly gopher and gemini client
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1084044: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1084044
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elpher":
* Package name : elpher
Version : 3.6.3-1
Upstream contact : Tim Vaughan <[email protected]>
* URL : gopher://thelambdalab.xyz/1/projects/elpher/
* License : GPL-3+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/elpher
Section : lisp
The source builds the following binary packages:
elpa-elpher - friendly gopher and gemini client
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/elpher/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/elpher/elpher_3.6.3-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
elpher (3.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload
.
[ Dhavan Vaidya ]
* New upstream version 3.2.2
.
[ Xiyue Deng ]
* New upstream version 3.6.3 (Closes: #1083208)
* Update Standards-Version to 4.7.0; no change needed
* Disable pristine-tar in d/gbp.conf as we now track upstream directly
* Add d/upstream/metadata
Regards,
--
Xiyue Deng
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
On Sat 05 Oct 2024 at 08:11pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Make sense. Though I am kinda sure that commit was what upstream used
> for the tarball of version 3.6.3, using a snapshot version format is
> safer. Just pushed another commit[1] to fix the version accordingly and
> reuploaded to mentors. PTAL.
The thing is, I think that NonGNU ELPA automatically updates, so if
that's the tarball you mean, then it doesn't tell us much.
Anyway -- uploaded, thank you for the fix.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
