Hi again Phil, tl;dr: worked on the copyright stuff, still will publish a new caspar/20240818-1 likely today.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 08:52:13AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 08:01:24AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > > Thanks a lot for this awesome analysis. I'll prepare another > > caspar/20240818-1, likely today. <snip> > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 03:54:59AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > <snip> > > > I: caspar source: no-dh-sequencer [debian/rules] > > > N: > > > N: This package does not use the dh sequencer in debian/rules. > > > N: > > > N: While maintainers may use a variety of build systems, this one is by > > > far > > > N: the most popular. > > > N: > > > N: Maintainers are strongly encouraged to use the dh sequencer in new > > > N: packages and convert existing ones when appropriate. > > > N: > > > N: Visibility: info > > > N: Show-Always: no > > > N: Check: debian/rules/dh-sequencer > > This is a tricky one. I'll think about it. > > > I: caspar source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.8 (released > > > 2016-04-06) > > > (current is 4.7.0) > > > N: > > > N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one > > > that > > > N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the > > > N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider > > > updating > > > N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field > > > N: appropriately. > > > N: > > > N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you > > > don't > > > N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version > > > control > > > N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you > > > upload > > > N: the package. > > > N: > > > N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the > > > N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of > > > N: Policy. > > > N: > > > N: Please refer to > > > N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for > > > N: details. > > > N: > > > N: Visibility: info > > > N: Show-Always: no > > > N: Check: fields/standards-version > > Will get to it. > > > I: caspar: spare-manual-page [usr/share/man/man1/csp_helper.1.gz] > > > N: > > > N: Each manual page in /usr/share/man should have a reason to be there. > > > This > > > N: manual page does not appear to have a valid reason to be shipped. > > > N: > > > N: For manual pages in sections 1 and 8, an executable (or a link to > > > one) > > > N: should exist. This check currently considers all installation > > > packages > > > N: created by the same sources, as long as they are present. > > > N: > > > N: Please refer to Manual pages (Section 12.1) in the Debian Policy > > > Manual > > > N: and Bug#583125 for details. > > > N: > > > N: Visibility: info > > > N: Show-Always: no > > > N: Check: documentation/manual > > > N: Renamed from: manpage-without-executable > > Likely a bug in lintian, will investigate. > > > I: Lintian run was successful. > > > > > > 3. Licenses [4]: Issue > > > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/caspar-20240818$ > > > lrc > > > en: Versions: recon 2.0 check 3.3.9-1 > > > > > > Parsing Source Tree .... > > > Reading d/copyright .... > > > Missing Files: Paragraph for debian/ > > > Running licensecheck .... > > > > > > d/copyright | licensecheck > > > > > > GPL-3+ | GPL bootstrap > > > GPL-3+ | GPL doc/include.zmm > > > GPL-3+ | GPL doc/Makefile.am > > > GPL-3+ | GPL doc/Makefile.in > > > GPL-3+ | FSFAP INSTALL > > > GPL-3+ | GPL Makefile.am > > > GPL-3+ | GPL Makefile.in > > > GPL-3+ | GPL setversion > > > > > > Hint: In some files, replacing 'GNU GPL' with 'GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE > > > Version 3 or later' will fix the issue. > > I'll think about what to do with this issue. Fixed, party in caspar "upstream" (which will take a while to trickly down into debian), partly in the Debian packaging (which I still hope to be able to ship today). <snip> > > > I believe <casper is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the > > > contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues. > > > > > > Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the > > > 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. > > > [1] pbuilder: > > > > > > * Command: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc > > > * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. > > > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks > > > > > > [2] sbuild: > > > > > > * Command: sbuild <PACKAGE>.dsc > > > * Document: > > > https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000002 > > > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild > > > > > > [3] lintian: > > > > > > * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, > > > *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be > > > thorough. > > > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian > > > > > > [4] lrc: > > > > > > * Command: lrc > > > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon > > > > > > [5] reprotest > > > > > > * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 > > > --auto- > > > build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild > > > * Document: > > > https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004 > > > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ > > > * Document: > > > https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method <snip> Bye, Joost
