Why don't you use monocypher as the source package's name? If libmonocypher is preferrable, please at least remove the 4.
- Bug#1120708: RFS: libmonocypher4/4.0.2-2 [ITP] -- easy to ... dzwdz
- Bug#1120708: RFS: libmonocypher4/4.0.2-2 [ITP] -- eas... Bastian Germann
- Bug#1120708: RFS: libmonocypher4/4.0.2-2 [ITP] -- eas... Bastian Germann
- Bug#1120708: RFS: monocypher/4.0.2-1 -- easy to use, ... Bastian Germann

