Dear Geert,

Thank you again for your guidance and for taking the time to point out the
issues with the duplicate RFS requests.

As you suggested, I have now:

1. Closed all duplicate RFS bugs for binclock (1143932, 1143933, 1143935)
2. Kept only Bug#1143934 as the single valid RFS for binclock 1.5-15

I understand the importance of respecting the time and effort of people in
the Debian community. In the future, I will make sure to only file one RFS
per package after the package is fully ready.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

Best regards,
Danial maleki

Reply via email to