Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any plan amongst dpkg type folk to visit and solve this problem? Or even a bug number?
There are several, of different severities, as you could easily have found out yourself.
I found an 8 year old wishlist bug on dpkg-dev, bug 4588. I found a debian-mentors discussion from 1999 where someone claims that dpkg-dev should not need to represent binary changes, http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/1999/06/msg00003.html .
Am I looking in the wrong places?
Are there any serious initiatives, with traction?
Nick
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
