On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:50:01PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Adeodato Sim� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.07.1742 +0100]:
> > * martin f krafft [Tue, 07 Dec 2004 12:26:41 +0100]:
> > > Why do you need LD_LIBRARY_PATH? are you running the binary during the
> > > build process?
> > 
> >   in the shipped binaries, I think he meant.
> 
> what, rpath? noooooooooo!
> do not hardcode the path.
Right, the build process first build the build system, which uses
shared libraries.  I am using LD_LIBRARY_PATH now for the build, which
actually makes alot of sense (to override any installed copies of
those libraries).

I found dh_shlibdeps -l useful, thanks.

I think I will actually be installing them into /usr/lib/, with a
proper soname (even though the soname won't serve any purpose, as the
executables are bundled with the library).

Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to