also sprach Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.2222 +0200]: > It makes sense for software developers to have their own ./debian > directory so that they can use debian/rules binary to compile and > test their software while developing it.
Huh? Why not just use ./Makefile?
> What does not make a lot of sense is to release the .tar.gz with
> the ./debian directory, as Steve Halasz said, it's perfectly valid
> to have it in CVS the important point would be to convince them
> not to include it in the release.
I disagree. ./debian is the domain of the Debian maintainer, not of
the upstream. Unless you are developing software *for* *Debian*
(native), there is no reason why you should bother with ./debian at
all.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
military intelligence is a contradiction in terms.
-- groucho marx
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
