-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13.06.2005, at 22:36, martin f krafft wrote:
A package that installs /usr/lib/libspf-1.0.so.0.0.0 should be names libspf-1.0-0 from all I can tell. The policy does not dictate how the -dev (and -doc) package should be named. I would prefer not to call it libspf-dev but rather encode the version.
If you see the -release bit as the API version you should name your dev package libspf-1.0-dev. That was at least what I was advised to do when I had the same problem some weeks ago.
Kind regards, Philipp Kern -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Fingerprint: 1710 7DB1 9A28 42FF B699 7654 ED1A 3933 B2CF CDD8 iEYEARECAAYFAkKt9DAACgkQ7Ro5M7LPzdj8KwCgnrObwP4dRHwtjri5RGuyqaOh mAEAn2C05nGr9/zzFsnUK+UUTTJEJ2Qq =6M2e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
