> I currently use "build" to create my packages and "deb-make" to start > them. Is there a reason why I should not. Some have expressed opinions > against these. Is it ford/chevy or is there a real reason??
Well, build is nothing but a simple wrapper around dpkg-buildpackage. If you give no arguments to it, you are effectively running dpkg-buildpackage. There is nothing wrong with starting your packages using deb-make either. However, using debstd in your rules file is being deprecated. Debhelper tools seem to be the superior product. Personally, I prefer to do it all myself without using the helper tools. -- Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation.... Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
