Apparently people are missing the point. If an item fails to meet the DFSG, it is non-free. Otherwise it is free. The whole point of Debian is to be a kind of mecca for free software. Our social contract spells this out in some detail.
Why are we going to wrestle with licenses and what not? If it fails to meet our guidelines it gets stuffed in non-free. Limbo. Once the license issue is cleared up, it can be moved. Rather than asking us to modify Debian, why not endeavor to convince people that free licenses are the best? -- ===== Linux, because I'd like to *get there* today
