On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 03:49:21PM +0900, Ionutz Borcoman wrote: > > Well, actually, I think you're only confusing the issue with > > '-DVDKDEBUG'. -dbg is for versions of libraries which debugging > > symbols exposed so that problems may be debugged. Compiling with a > > different define, at least in my opinion, lowers the usefulness of the > > -dbg package since it's actually different (i.e., a bug for libfoo > > might not show up in libfoo-dbg, since different *code* may be > > included.). > > -DVDKDEBUG increase the debugging level, not lowers it. The source code > has a lot of code between #ifdef -- #endif statements, which will not be > compiled if this flag is not set. Therefore I think makeing my -dbg with > it is a good thing.
No :) Because this method is usually used to debug the LIBRARY while the -dbg
packages are used to debug the program you wrote using that lib. If you really
think the library is buggy you have to install the source anyway.
> TIA,
>
> Ionutz
cu
Torsten
pgpJ2OZKFxFSO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
