Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 12:19:26PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote: > > W: libaspell0: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libaspell.so.0.0.0 > > usr/lib/libaspell.so > > usr/lib/libaspell.so.0.0.0 > > usr/lib/libaspell.so -> libaspell.so.0.0.0 > > Simply, make this libaspell.so go into the libaspell-dev package. > How to do it "the right way" I don't know, but simple rming and lning > would do the trick.
But I want to build a total of four packages - aspell (containing the binaries), libaspell0 (containing the libraries), libaspell-dev (containing the header files) and aspell-doc (containg the documentation). Do you think I should just build three packages instead - aspell (binaries + shared libraries), libaspell-dev (headers + static libraries) and aspell-doc (containg the documentation) ? > > And (sorry to ask a really stupid Q) why is it > > libaspell.so.0.0.0 and not libaspell.so.0.26.2 ? > Was it .0.26.2 before? No. I was just wondering whether it should be .so.0.26.2 . Thaths -- Homer: Now, what do we say when we get to the ticket booth? Bart and Lisa: We're under six. Homer: And I'm a college student! Sudhakar C13n http://people.netscape.com/thaths/ Indentured Slave
