>>>>> On Wed, 5 May 1999 15:43:27 +0200, Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Sven> On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 09:26:14AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith Sven> wrote: >> >> Roderick Schertler wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 26 Apr 1999 16:20:02 -0400, Peter S Galbraith >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > ca> said: >> > > >> > > I _just_ found a little bug and would like to replace with -1 >> > > package with a new one with the same name (but new changes >> > > file with new checksum). Can I do that? Or Must I upload a >> > > version -2 ? >> > >> > You should use a new version number if it was in incoming for >> > more than a minute or two, because people download packages from >> > incoming and its mirrors. >> > >> > -- Roderick Schertler [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Good point. It's too late now, unless I upload a new -2 version >> identical to the changed -1 version. Sven> a -1.1 will do also, altough dotted debian versions are Sven> ususally reserved for NMUs. Sven> or you could do a -1.updated or or something like that ... Umm. why would you even consider either of these options? a -2 is the only good choice (and I think a good idea in this case). Dres -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @ http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
