James Mastros writes: > Package it as version 1:1.1; next time package as 1:2.0.2, which will > give the ordering you're looking for. (The 1: is an "era"; it won't > normaly get displayed. Made for just this sort of thing.)
It's an "epoch", I believe. I know about epochs, but I've never seen anyone suggest using them without meeting with cries of outrage. Thus I would like to avoid them if at all possible. I am also just a bit astonished by the notion that 1.1 < 1.02. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI
