On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 12:33:53AM +1000, Chris Leishman wrote: > > > So my question is, should I provide a non-crypto enabled version, and > > > if so, do I need to have seperate source packages? > > > > Two sources are definitely needed, however, I don't know whether we > > actually need to change the US one to exclude anything crypto related. > > I'm CC:ing also our -legal team, which should know what to do. > > Why should we need to have two differing copies? Everyone can download > from non-US servers - they just can't be hosted in the US.
Yes, but non-US is a separate repository, and we can't let the non-US binaries get out of sync with US sources, or vice versa. Or can we upload a non-US package to master's dinstall, which would then forward it to its pandora counterpart? I think not, but it'd be a nice feature to have. > (IMHO main is only in 'US' servers because the majority of developers > are in the US). That's not the point. It's not important where main is, but where non-US is, and that obviously can't be in US. But this is a totally different topic... -- enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
