On 27-Jul-99 David Coe wrote: > I'm preparing a new distribution of ispell (current upstream > version, just packaging and debian standards changes), and > at the same time preparing to package a prerelease of the > next upstream version. > > Do we have a "standard" or traditional way of naming > alternate upstream pre-release version packages? > > I'd like to call the packages ispell and ispell-prerelease > or something like that. What do you suggest? >
Why upload both? I would rather see either a) upload the other to experimental or b) place it on a web/ftp site somewhere (with a package file so apt can get it) or c) just release it instead why clutter the ftp with a package that will have to be removed?
