tony mancill wrote: > On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to > > > rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right? > > > > I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning "a recompile of -2". I've seen > > that quite often, don't know how official it is. > > I think that this is pretty much equivalent to the following section from > the Debian Developer's Reference: [cut] > For instance, a recompile-only NMU > of the source package ``foo_1.3-1'' would be numbered > ``foo_1.3-1.0.1''.
Thanks a bunch to both of you! That's great news, I wonder why I never caught on to that. Peter
