On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Christian Hammers wrote: > > Well, I never received a mail froma an autobuilder saying that one of > > my packages (about 10) were examined and found to have the following > > buildtime dependencies. > > Probably because it's a recent change. > > > Maybe this should be done so that they can be included (as required by > > policy, or not?) into the control file by the maintainers. > > Just upload something and wait until the m68k autobuilder hits it.. I think Roman reports those things as bugs, so maybe you're just a good maintainer?
See here for some of the source-dependencies the autobuilders use: http://buildd.debian.org/andrea/m68k/source-dependencies-unstable.gz And maybe here for an older text I have written when Build-Depends came up (this may be seriously out of date, I let the daemons do the bug reporting now) http://www.debian.org/~cts/Build-Depends I did not follow the discussion completely, but I think its rather pointless, since its all already there in sbuild and the build-daemons. If you look at some of the bugs Roman has reported for the m68k-buildd http://master.debian.org/~cpbs/subs/r/romanhodekinformatikunierlangende.html (Missing build dependencies) you should see this. I do not want to pick a package from that list now, beside, uk.debian seems not to work ATM... Christian
