Stefan Alfredsson writes: [Jeopardectomy]
> Quoting Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > see any gpg options to mh, and if I include my scanned identification as > > an attachment, then it will not count as input to the hash of the message. > This might be somewhat inconvenient, but how about including MD5 sums > of the attachments in the body of the message, which is then signed? > (i.e. md5sums *.jpg + cutnpaste) I made a sig separately and attached that. 'man gpg'... ; gpg --detach-sign --armor decklin-foster-id.jpg -- There is no TRUTH. There is no REALITY. There is no CONSISTENCY. There are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS. I'm very probably wrong. -- BSD fortune(6)
