Peter Palfrader wrote: > >> I think a point could be made for including a bogus bug in a >> guy's first package so he can learn the changelog procedure for >> closing it while he's still in close contact with his sponsor. > > Since ITPs are now reported as bugs against wnpp you have your > training bug.
Ah, sure. Problem solved. Thanks. Both the fellows I'm sponsoring ITP'd before this existed, at least formally. I recommended doing the wnpp bug anyway but it's easy to make it a little stronger than a recommendation. Rick --
