On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:56:12PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:45:10PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:39:46AM -0500, An Thi-Nguyen Le wrote: > > > > > > In particular, I want to (eventually) adopt the fvwm[1] packages. I have > > > toyed with the idea of contacting the current maintainer offering these > > > packages even though I haven't been contacted by an AM yet but I'm > > > not sure if that's right or wrong. > > Only even contemplate adopting fvwm if you know or are willing to work > hard at learning Xlib. It's a tough package (as I discovered to my > cost.) There are a couple of people who have expressed interest, and > when I have time to go through my inbox (soon, I really hope, but RL > is crazy right now), I will see whether they want it. Do you want me > to add you to the list? >
hi julian! i'm one of that couple of people you talked about. i think you can safely remove me from your list, this code is very hard for me to understand very well. i prefer to keep fewer packages but in a better way. maybe when i'll be a better coder i try it again. thank you anyway :) -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc --[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
