Hi idalton!
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I used a Provides: statement to solve a similar problem cropping up in
> dselect on my system. What if you add
> Provides: grafix
> to your package, and see if that works.
> I'm not sure about having a new package providing an older, obsoleted
> package and then removing the Provides in dist+1 or dist+2 though.
> Would be nice to know if it would solve your immediate problem with
> apt-get [dist-]upgrade.
quoting Joy:
| > Perhaps we need an updated (and empty) binary grafix that depends
| > on grafix1? How long would we keep that binary around?
|
| That's right. But that's an ugly workaround for a feature that's missing in
| the packaging system. I'd rather not do it...
Therefore I'll now upload a new grafix source that builds
Package: grafix1
Replaces: grafix
Conflicts: grafix
Package: grafix-dev
Depends: grafix1 (= ${Source-Version}), libg++2.8.1.3-dev, xlibs-dev
Conflicts: grafix
apt-get won't catch it automatically but if you install grafix1 or grafix-dev
with apt-get install or dpkg everything works fine.
Thanks
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted messages preferred.
http://www.palfrader.org/
