On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:05:16AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 04:18:09AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote: > > > > > > Should I therefore keep these supplementary utilities in the viewmol > > > directory, or should they instead be moved to /usr/bin? > > > > if they're binaries that are typically wrapped or otherwise not > > typically invoked directly by the user, /usr/lib is probably fine > > otherwise they should probably be in /usr/bin. > > > > Hmm, that's a hard one to judge. I guess they *could* be used > independently, but they just transform coordinates to viewmol's own internal > system, which would arguably be a bit useless for general use. But maybe > someone could find a use for it.
well.. for i in *; do * $i;done the point is if its typical/normal/expected use do these programs _usually_ get invoked by something else? or is it reasonable for a user to run them himself. given that upstream has decided to put them in /usr/lib, its probably reasonable that you follow suit. -- Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org LPSG "member" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
